2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 210 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 420 (184 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 1998 Rover 420 | |
| Make | Kia | Rover |
| Model | Cee'd | 420 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 1189 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |
