2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Suzuki XL6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Suzuki XL6 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (187 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Kia | Suzuki |
| Model | Cee'd | XL6 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1341 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |
