2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 229 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 2009 Kia Cee'd has manual transmission. 2009 Kia Cee'd will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cee'd | Dingo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1399 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |