2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi SUP would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi SUP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP weights approximately 642 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 2002 Mitsubishi SUP | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cee'd | SUP |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 90 L |