2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 112 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Kia | Suzuki |
| Model | Cee'd | F1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |
