2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 596 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Kia | ZAZ |
Model | Cee'd | Wagon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.5 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1341 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2330 mm |