2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2003 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 182 kg more than 2003 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 2003 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Cee'd | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
