2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Cee'd | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.4 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1263 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |