2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero

To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Oldsmobile Alero would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (141 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 27 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (203 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (187 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Kia Cee'd 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
Make Kia Oldsmobile
Model Cee'd Alero
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1975 cc 2196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 140 HP
Torque 187 Nm 203 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93.5 mm 94 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1341 kg 1368 kg
Vehicle Length 4240 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.1 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 53 L