2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cee'd | Colt |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
