2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (305 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Cee'd | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Kia | Holden |
| Model | Cee'd | Epica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
