2009 Kia Cee'd vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Kia Cee'd. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Kia Cee'd would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cee'd | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Cee'd | Cruze |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 255 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2685 mm |