2009 Kia Cerato vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2009 Kia Cerato is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cerato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cerato (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cerato weights approximately 459 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cerato (245 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cerato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Cerato | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Kia | Riley |
Model | Cerato | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |