2009 Kia Optima vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Kia | Studebaker |
Model | Optima | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2980 mm |