2009 Kia Optima vs. 1965 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Seven.
Because 1965 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1965 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Optima | Seven |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 29 L |