2009 Kia Optima vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Because 1965 NSU Autonova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Autonova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | Kia | NSU |
Model | Optima | Autonova |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 37 L |