2009 Kia Optima vs. 1972 Triumph Stag

To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1972 Triumph Stag. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph Stag.

Because 1972 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph Stag. (193 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph Stag.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Kia Optima 1972 Triumph Stag
Make Kia Triumph
Model Optima Stag
Year Released 2009 1972
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2359 cc 2997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 229 Nm 193 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1260 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2550 mm