2009 Kia Optima vs. 1980 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 2101.
Because 1980 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1980 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Kia | Zastava |
Model | Optima | 2101 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2430 mm |