2009 Kia Optima vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (176 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Optima | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Kia | Zastava |
| Model | Optima | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 229 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |
