2009 Kia Optima vs. 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo (182 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.
Because 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Optima. (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Optima | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |