2009 Kia Optima vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo. 1986 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 2009 Kia Optima has manual transmission. 2009 Kia Optima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Kia | Ford |
Model | Optima | Tempo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |