2009 Kia Optima vs. 2000 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Almera. (134 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Almera.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Almera. (178 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2000 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Optima | Almera |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |