2009 Kia Optima vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Optima | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.5 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |