2009 Kia Optima vs. 2000 Volvo S60

To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (176 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Optima. (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Kia Optima 2000 Volvo S60
Make Kia Volvo
Model Optima S60
Year Released 2009 2000
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2359 cc 2319 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 176 HP 246 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 229 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.4 L/100km 7.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 14.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 10.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 70 L