2009 Kia Optima vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.
Because 2002 Toyota F-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota F-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Optima. (229 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Optima | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Optima | F-1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 229 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
