2009 Kia Optima vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Optima weights approximately 14 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor. 2009 Kia Optima has automatic transmission and 2003 Toyota Condor has manual transmission. 2003 Toyota Condor will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Kia Optima will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Optima | Condor |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2656 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.7 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1519 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |