2009 Kia Optima vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura CSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura CSX would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura CSX. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Kia | Acura |
Model | Optima | CSX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.5 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |