2009 Kia Optima vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 886 kg more than 2009 Kia Optima.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (250 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Optima | Almera |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2656 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1519 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |