2009 Kia Optima vs. 2013 Mazda 5
To start off, 2013 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 5. (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Optima | 2013 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Optima | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 229 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.5 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |