2009 Kia Rondo vs. 2003 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2009 Kia Rondo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lancia Ypsilon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Rondo (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Rondo weights approximately 605 kg more than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lancia Ypsilon (184 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Rondo. (169 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Lancia Ypsilon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Rondo. 2009 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2003 Lancia Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2003 Lancia Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Rondo | 2003 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Kia | Lancia |
Model | Rondo | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1250 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 18.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 47 L |