2009 Kia Rondo vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Kia Rondo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Kia Rondo would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Milan weights approximately 406 kg more than 2009 Kia Rondo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Kia Rondo | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Rondo | Milan |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2656 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |