2009 Kia Sedona vs. 1967 Simca 1200S
To start off, 2009 Kia Sedona is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Sedona (160 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Simca 1200S. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1967 Simca 1200S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Sedona weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Simca 1200S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Sedona (350 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Simca 1200S. (103 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Simca 1200S. 2009 Kia Sedona has automatic transmission and 1967 Simca 1200S has manual transmission. 1967 Simca 1200S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Kia Sedona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Kia Sedona | 1967 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Kia | Simca |
| Model | Sedona | 1200S |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 53 L |
