2009 Lada 110 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Lada 110 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Lada 110. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 110 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 110 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 110 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 57 L |