2009 Lada 110 vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2009 Lada 110 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2009 Lada 110. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lotus Eclat (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 110. (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1980 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada 110 | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Lada | Lotus |
| Model | 110 | Eclat |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 67 L |
