2009 Lada 110 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Lada 110 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2009 Lada 110. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 110. (116 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 110. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 2009 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2009 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 110 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | 110 | FTO |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |