2009 Lada 110 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Lada 110 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2009 Lada 110. (91 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 718 kg more than 2009 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 110. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2009 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2009 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada 110 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | 110 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.7 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1833 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |
