2009 Lada 111 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Lada 111 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Lada 111. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2009 Lada 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 111. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 111 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lada | Triumph |
Model | 111 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |