2009 Lada 111 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Lada 111 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2009 Lada 111. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 490 kg more than 2009 Lada 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (262 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 111. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 111. 2006 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2009 Lada 111 has manual transmission. 2009 Lada 111 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada 111 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | 111 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 262 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 66 L |
