2009 Lada 21 vs. 1963 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Flavia (91 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lancia Flavia (146 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (120 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1963 Lancia Flavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada 21 | 1963 Lancia Flavia | |
| Make | Lada | Lancia |
| Model | 21 | Flavia |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 48 L |
