2009 Lada 21 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 21 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | 21 | Elan |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 29 L |