2009 Lada 21 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 461 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 21 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 21 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 62 L |