2009 Lada 21 vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Rogue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Rogue would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Lada 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (120 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada 21 | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | 21 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |