2009 Lada Kalina vs. 1963 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2009 Lada Kalina is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Flavia (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Lada Kalina. (58 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Kalina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 30 kg more than 2009 Lada Kalina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Lancia Flavia (146 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Kalina. (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Lancia Flavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Kalina.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Lada Kalina | 1963 Lancia Flavia | |
| Make | Lada | Lancia |
| Model | Kalina | Flavia |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 48 L |
