2009 Lada Kalina vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Lada Kalina is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada Kalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2009 Lada Kalina. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Kalina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Kalina weights approximately 215 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lada Kalina (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Lada Kalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Kalina | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Kalina | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2420 mm |