2009 Lada Kalina vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Lada Kalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Lada Kalina would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada Kalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2009 Lada Kalina. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Kalina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lada Kalina (120 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Lada Kalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Kalina | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Kalina | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 46 L |