2009 Lada Niva vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Lada Niva is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Niva weights approximately 325 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Niva | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |