2009 Lada Niva vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 Lada Niva is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Niva weights approximately 340 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Niva | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | Niva | Celeste |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |