2009 Lada Niva vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2009 Lada Niva is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Niva | 1992 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | Niva | Magna |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |