2009 Lada Niva vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Lada Niva is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 2009 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Niva weights approximately 45 kg more than 1998 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (294 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Niva | 1998 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 76 L |