2009 Lada Niva vs. 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Lada Niva would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 983 more horse power than 2009 Lada Niva. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Niva weights approximately 5 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 932 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada Niva. (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lada Niva | 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Lada | Koenigsegg |
Model | Niva | CCXR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 19.3 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 22 L/100km |